Saturday, January 17, 2004
Does it get any worse than this?
NO.
That's what I said when I read a TIME magazine article about the latest load of stupidity from the creators of- get this- Teletubbies. It looks slightly more horrifying, and even stupider. And it's called Boohbah. Yes, this brought to you by the same people who made the sexually questionably show "Teletubbies", which featured horny little creatures (one of which was openly gay) with deviant sex symbols atop their heads.
Now let's just look at the name of the new load of crap. Boohbah. That's a term I have heard repeatedly each day to describe breasts (take a look at those boohbahs, man, I could squeeze those!!!) Perverts. Also, click here and look at the shapes of the little bitches. Watch their movement. This latest threat to childrens' mental development is both stupid and perverted at the same time. Rather than 16 year olds saying "I LOOOVE Boohbahs" we're going to have 6 year olds saying it. And here I thought Barney was bad...
Man, the things kids are exposed to. (See Anti-Pedophile article)
That's what I said when I read a TIME magazine article about the latest load of stupidity from the creators of- get this- Teletubbies. It looks slightly more horrifying, and even stupider. And it's called Boohbah. Yes, this brought to you by the same people who made the sexually questionably show "Teletubbies", which featured horny little creatures (one of which was openly gay) with deviant sex symbols atop their heads.
Now let's just look at the name of the new load of crap. Boohbah. That's a term I have heard repeatedly each day to describe breasts (take a look at those boohbahs, man, I could squeeze those!!!) Perverts. Also, click here and look at the shapes of the little bitches. Watch their movement. This latest threat to childrens' mental development is both stupid and perverted at the same time. Rather than 16 year olds saying "I LOOOVE Boohbahs" we're going to have 6 year olds saying it. And here I thought Barney was bad...
Man, the things kids are exposed to. (See Anti-Pedophile article)
Friday, January 16, 2004
Stupid Websites that you can spam and flame.
The Atkins Diet
The Anti-American Communist Lunatics United (ACLU)
Dr. Phil's
Pokemon
Barney
Teletubbies
Martha Stewart
GLAAD
Beyblades
Michael Jackson
Destroy all these places... heh heh...
The Anti-American Communist Lunatics United (ACLU)
Dr. Phil's
Pokemon
Barney
Teletubbies
Martha Stewart
GLAAD
Beyblades
Michael Jackson
Destroy all these places... heh heh...
Just about the sickest thing ever.
This site is young. It's probably going to last a very, very, very long time, but one issue that concerns me is the disgusting and vile practice of pedophilia. Child-pornography. Sick-assed shyt like that just makes me want to freaking vomit. It is so wrong, on so many levels, and I am making it Demon Phoenix 1337 Policy that from this point on, Demon Phoenix Productions will mount a full-scale, all-out online war against pedophiles, pedophile netgroups, and their disgusting practices and fetishes. Now, you may ask, why am I going to oppose this sick shyt? It has everything to do with a link I recieved in a chat room. This link takes you to a website where devoted, good people fight pedophilia relentlessly. I must warn you though, if you want to go there, you should probably bring a barf bag and a box of kleenex, and remove all sharp objects from your presence. This site gives the full chats, taken in chatrooms, that pedophiles have with their "victims" (of course, these victims are usually 20-30 years of age and coordinating with law enforcement officials... lol). Some of it is pretty graphic. Some of it is flat out disgusting. Some of it, though, you will read and you will want to hunt that person down and kick their ass.
You want to know something? I haven't been on this planet very long and I'm already sick of it. I'm sick of the perversion, sick of the disgusting shyt that waits around every corner to surprise an unsuspecting CHILD. There are CHILDREN out there, you fucked-up pornographers! Your sickening shyt gets displayed to CHILDREN. You take advantage of CHILDREN. What manner of insanity, of sickness, of utter vileness permits the mind to even consider the possibility of exposing innocent children to pornography, let alone forcing them to be a part of it! What kind of depraved asshole could do that? I'm sorry for the language folks, but after going to that site and reading what those filthy pedophiles are REALLY like, I'm in a royally pissed off mood.
There is a girl at school who I really like, and I have seen first hand what subtle pedophilia is just by watching the prinicpal of the school. He asks the pretty girls at school (including the aforementioned) for hugs, ogles at them in the halls, and behaved in a manner in the 2002-2003 school year which led many students to believe he was having an affair with a student (not confirmed, so if you're a lawyer trying to get me for "slander", piss off). We don't know if it's true or not, but the fact remains- PERVERT! Watching ANYONE go after kids just makes me want to bust them in the face- repeatedly- with a hockey stick. I just can't stand it.
It doesn't help that in this country we have CHILDPORN "ORGANIZATIONS" like NAMBLA. That is utterly and absolutely sickening. Do you know what NAMBLA is? The North American Man-Boy Love Association, who support- get this- Men and BOYS, especially boys 12-18, having love relationships that center around sex. When I first heard of that shyt, I didn't believe it. Nobody would have the gall to create such a group. But holy crap was I wrong, it's real, and it has the full backing of such wonderful little groups like the ACLU. I learned this and became physically ill for nearly a week. We probably should call the ACLU a child porn ring as well, because they have rabidly fought against anti-pedophile legislation in the past and today. Don't deny it. I'm too lazy to post links right now to prove it, all I can say is go do a friggin' Google search on "ACLU Child Porn" and read it for yourself.
This country is on the fucking INTERSTATE for degradation, social decay, destruction of its borders, complete loss of morality, corruption, feminization, and loss of integrity! We have public homosexuality, internet porn, child porn, and corrupt politicians who will DO or SAY ANYTHING for a vote (Gray Davis' sickening display of pandering to frickin' illegal immigrants, which is also a good example of border destruction). Socially, we are on the brink of a second civil war. Too long has American society had "tolerance" quite literally forced upon it by fringe whackos and bleeding-ass liberals. In the 1950's, society was forced to endure porno, people opposed it. Today, we have to put up with homosexuals and transgenders wreaking havoc upon our families and values, and the seeds of pedophilia and even beastiality have already been sowed. Notice a pattern here? How long will it be, America, how far will these perverts go, how much will they get away with? Will it go to the real ugly stuff, will it hit sadomasochism before we realize the price of our perversions is fucking HUMAN LIVES?
How can a nation of almost 300 million put UP with this sort of shyt? Okay, yeah, I'll give you, homosexuality isn't really THAT bad. I'm not concerned with the individuals. Yes, it's nasty, but they're free to pursue their acts so long as it does not piss the rest of society off. I am concerned about PUBLIC TOLERANCE of it, and where it is going now. If one ASSHOLE WHACK JOB PINKO BITCH liberal SCUM can nearly tear down 225 years of God in the frickin Pledge of Allegiance, think what the members of Nambla will do to all of society! We absolutely HAVE to put a stop to every last vestige of "tolerate gays" in our society. If someone wants to tolerate them, that's fine. If someone wants to be disgusted with them, that's also fine. But stop the battle about it, it isn't worth letting the scum of all creation slither out of the woodwork and destroy society.
I know I'm right. The more tolerance society has of one thing, the more it will begin to gain on others. Oh yeah, I know right now that millions of people who support homosexuals would come right out of their proverbial closets and denounce pedophilia and beastiality, but remember that in the 50's and earlier, many people who supported pornography were viciously opposed to homosexuals. If the trend continues, it will be like an infection that destroys layer of tissue after layer of tissue until it reaches the bone. I know most people (And I had better be right or fuck it, I'm moving to Brazil) are opposed to child porn. So use your judgement, see where society will take this!
Will gay marriage destroy America? Probably not. Will it cheapen family values? Drastically. It won't destroy America, but you can almost compare it to a fire burning a building, destroying the woodwork. As the fire spreads, and the building sustains structural damage, the woodwork eventually fails. The building falls. So fight the fire. Stop this BULLSHIT now while we're still ahead. Stop this great country from reaching newer, more disgusting levels of sexual perversion than it has already reached, and let it heal from it's wounds. I'm not asking you to vote for Bush or to listen to Rush Limbaugh, or for you to run a city-wide campaign to oust pedophiles. I'm just asking you to stop the spread of sexual tolerance before we sink below zero-barrier into a quagmire of perversion so intense that there is a civil war.
I'm not saying all tolerance is a bad thing. It just needs to be balanced. Sexual Tolerance and Racial Tolerance are not equal. Racial Tolerance is perfectly acceptable, because people are born white, black, yellow, whatever. Sexual Tolerance is bullshyt. People are not born gay, they are not born pedophiles, they are not born beastiality freaks. If I see plausible, exact evidence of a gay gene, supported with paragraph upon paragraph of proof, chemical formulas, support by the ENTIRE scientific community (and not just one fringe whacko bleeding-ass liberal who probably doesn't even know what DNA means) I will delete this site. And if anyone even thinks about trying to decieve the public by telling people there's pedophile gene, or something similar, I will put a contract on their head.
I've said my piece on this topic. I can't say anymore. I'm not even frickin' 20 yet and I'm already sick and tired of hearing it on the news. There's an MTV "Fight for your Rights" commercial where two gay college students go to a butcher to get some sausage, talk about their sickening intercourse habits, and then kiss. How revolting. How utterly REVOLTING. So how much farther will YOU let it go?
You want to know something? I haven't been on this planet very long and I'm already sick of it. I'm sick of the perversion, sick of the disgusting shyt that waits around every corner to surprise an unsuspecting CHILD. There are CHILDREN out there, you fucked-up pornographers! Your sickening shyt gets displayed to CHILDREN. You take advantage of CHILDREN. What manner of insanity, of sickness, of utter vileness permits the mind to even consider the possibility of exposing innocent children to pornography, let alone forcing them to be a part of it! What kind of depraved asshole could do that? I'm sorry for the language folks, but after going to that site and reading what those filthy pedophiles are REALLY like, I'm in a royally pissed off mood.
There is a girl at school who I really like, and I have seen first hand what subtle pedophilia is just by watching the prinicpal of the school. He asks the pretty girls at school (including the aforementioned) for hugs, ogles at them in the halls, and behaved in a manner in the 2002-2003 school year which led many students to believe he was having an affair with a student (not confirmed, so if you're a lawyer trying to get me for "slander", piss off). We don't know if it's true or not, but the fact remains- PERVERT! Watching ANYONE go after kids just makes me want to bust them in the face- repeatedly- with a hockey stick. I just can't stand it.
It doesn't help that in this country we have CHILDPORN "ORGANIZATIONS" like NAMBLA. That is utterly and absolutely sickening. Do you know what NAMBLA is? The North American Man-Boy Love Association, who support- get this- Men and BOYS, especially boys 12-18, having love relationships that center around sex. When I first heard of that shyt, I didn't believe it. Nobody would have the gall to create such a group. But holy crap was I wrong, it's real, and it has the full backing of such wonderful little groups like the ACLU. I learned this and became physically ill for nearly a week. We probably should call the ACLU a child porn ring as well, because they have rabidly fought against anti-pedophile legislation in the past and today. Don't deny it. I'm too lazy to post links right now to prove it, all I can say is go do a friggin' Google search on "ACLU Child Porn" and read it for yourself.
This country is on the fucking INTERSTATE for degradation, social decay, destruction of its borders, complete loss of morality, corruption, feminization, and loss of integrity! We have public homosexuality, internet porn, child porn, and corrupt politicians who will DO or SAY ANYTHING for a vote (Gray Davis' sickening display of pandering to frickin' illegal immigrants, which is also a good example of border destruction). Socially, we are on the brink of a second civil war. Too long has American society had "tolerance" quite literally forced upon it by fringe whackos and bleeding-ass liberals. In the 1950's, society was forced to endure porno, people opposed it. Today, we have to put up with homosexuals and transgenders wreaking havoc upon our families and values, and the seeds of pedophilia and even beastiality have already been sowed. Notice a pattern here? How long will it be, America, how far will these perverts go, how much will they get away with? Will it go to the real ugly stuff, will it hit sadomasochism before we realize the price of our perversions is fucking HUMAN LIVES?
How can a nation of almost 300 million put UP with this sort of shyt? Okay, yeah, I'll give you, homosexuality isn't really THAT bad. I'm not concerned with the individuals. Yes, it's nasty, but they're free to pursue their acts so long as it does not piss the rest of society off. I am concerned about PUBLIC TOLERANCE of it, and where it is going now. If one ASSHOLE WHACK JOB PINKO BITCH liberal SCUM can nearly tear down 225 years of God in the frickin Pledge of Allegiance, think what the members of Nambla will do to all of society! We absolutely HAVE to put a stop to every last vestige of "tolerate gays" in our society. If someone wants to tolerate them, that's fine. If someone wants to be disgusted with them, that's also fine. But stop the battle about it, it isn't worth letting the scum of all creation slither out of the woodwork and destroy society.
I know I'm right. The more tolerance society has of one thing, the more it will begin to gain on others. Oh yeah, I know right now that millions of people who support homosexuals would come right out of their proverbial closets and denounce pedophilia and beastiality, but remember that in the 50's and earlier, many people who supported pornography were viciously opposed to homosexuals. If the trend continues, it will be like an infection that destroys layer of tissue after layer of tissue until it reaches the bone. I know most people (And I had better be right or fuck it, I'm moving to Brazil) are opposed to child porn. So use your judgement, see where society will take this!
Will gay marriage destroy America? Probably not. Will it cheapen family values? Drastically. It won't destroy America, but you can almost compare it to a fire burning a building, destroying the woodwork. As the fire spreads, and the building sustains structural damage, the woodwork eventually fails. The building falls. So fight the fire. Stop this BULLSHIT now while we're still ahead. Stop this great country from reaching newer, more disgusting levels of sexual perversion than it has already reached, and let it heal from it's wounds. I'm not asking you to vote for Bush or to listen to Rush Limbaugh, or for you to run a city-wide campaign to oust pedophiles. I'm just asking you to stop the spread of sexual tolerance before we sink below zero-barrier into a quagmire of perversion so intense that there is a civil war.
I'm not saying all tolerance is a bad thing. It just needs to be balanced. Sexual Tolerance and Racial Tolerance are not equal. Racial Tolerance is perfectly acceptable, because people are born white, black, yellow, whatever. Sexual Tolerance is bullshyt. People are not born gay, they are not born pedophiles, they are not born beastiality freaks. If I see plausible, exact evidence of a gay gene, supported with paragraph upon paragraph of proof, chemical formulas, support by the ENTIRE scientific community (and not just one fringe whacko bleeding-ass liberal who probably doesn't even know what DNA means) I will delete this site. And if anyone even thinks about trying to decieve the public by telling people there's pedophile gene, or something similar, I will put a contract on their head.
I've said my piece on this topic. I can't say anymore. I'm not even frickin' 20 yet and I'm already sick and tired of hearing it on the news. There's an MTV "Fight for your Rights" commercial where two gay college students go to a butcher to get some sausage, talk about their sickening intercourse habits, and then kiss. How revolting. How utterly REVOLTING. So how much farther will YOU let it go?
Thursday, January 15, 2004
This is cool.
If ever you get ahold of someone's IP address, you can use this website to locate their exact location. Perfect for terrorizing people on the internet that you really don't like. Just use it wisely, that way nobody calls you a stalker. Stalking is not cool.
Sunday, January 11, 2004
The Impersonator is Back for seconds!
I'm going to start this off right here and now by saying that stupid people are so completely fun to mock! Because when you use logic to counter them, their original argument goes out the window and you get a big, bloated, stupid mess like this! Lol... I've seen some dumb ones before but this one has got to be one of the better ones out there. So without any further ado, I bring you Round Two: DemonPhoenix1337 vs. Impersonator. Enjoy!
"wow, look at that little matexplosimatron!!!!! isnt that adorable!!!!!"
(Matt Xplosion is a name I use on message boards.)
Evidently, this little turd burglar can't read a word spelled right in front of his face... and adorable? I thought you were homophobic. I think this one may surpass the original in sheer and complete retarded-ness.
"and he does not understand irony!!!! which wouldnt matter, because he is a jew nazi faggot like myself!!"
More historical and now, sociological, contradictins inherent in his statements. And as for irony, I know and understand exactly what you are doing. I'm just making you look even stupider than you already are by using reason, rather than your brand of mindlessness.
"you might as well be in a wheelchair you are so stupid."
So now you're picking on the disabled as well! Wow. I'm impressed at how much of an asshole you are.
"listen pillowdancer, i was conservative while you were still eating out your dad's ass. and i think thats cool. and its really cool how you have no imagimination, and must take everything literally."
Okay, how can you talk about having no imagination when you say little words of wisdom like "eat out your dad's ass", huh? That's not very imaginative. And, an unimaginative person would, rather than compose a nice statement to hammer your excessive stupidity, simply join in and act just like you. Like an utter buffoon. And sorry to say, but it's reports like these that look good on job interviews and such. If you had a sarcastic, stupid message like the one i'm dismembering now in your portfolio you would never have a job. Just telling you that, since you are probably too stupid to have figured it out yourself.
"regarding my insults. i am a doctor of vitamintology. i am so smart that i do not have to make sense, because, there are many ignorant people out there that will follow my every word without any question."
No, you are an idiotic flamer who tries to act like Michael Savage and ends up sounding more like a slightly more intelligent version of Bill Clinton.
"you arent a racist? well, i am, you stupid nigger!!!!"
I thought EZboard's censors would catch the n-word. And I'm not black. Oh, and while we're on the topic... go call a black person a "n*****" and see what happens to you. You'll either be beaten shitless or face a lawsuit. Or better yet- I could just tell my 31337 friend Chaotic about your little anti-black tirade, and he'll just dismember your computer rather than your arguments.
" im mikey savage, i think all black people are evil wizards!!"
Well you're obviously not Michael Savage. And see above, racist scum.
"or something equally idiotic!!! i may be a stupid, self loathing jew, with alot of hate, but more than that, i am a brilliant buisinessman.SmOoCh!!! "
So let's get this straight, you compare yourself with the nazis and commies? You need psychological help. Badly. Lol.
"i simply figured out how i could make money off of a bunch of flag @#%$ neanderthals like yourself, and it has made me a millionair!!!! double smooch. listen, i do not care about gramattimacl mistaykes!!!"
More racism, anti-Americanism, stupidity, and deliberate at that. Retardation breeds.
" i am mikey savage, and grammer is for borderjumping nazi commie jews like yourself, and you are so into me."
Again, thank God you're not Michael Savage. Of course, if you were, you wouldn't be famous, because you're being a bitch.
"if i said, "listen, meatxaplishin, seriously, why dont you and me just 69 eachother, i mean, just between two heterosexual men, and, you think im the coolest and all, so, whaddaya sa-"
my sentance would be cut off by your tounge gliding smoothly through my anus. nighty night. you sir, are the definition of a commie jew nazi!!!@!$#%@!$@$##5 "
Okay, this just epitomizes being disgusting, and this is far lower than any humor. You suck at debate. There's no question about that now.
"snuggifully yours, "
Ew, I hope not.
"wow, look at that little matexplosimatron!!!!! isnt that adorable!!!!!"
(Matt Xplosion is a name I use on message boards.)
Evidently, this little turd burglar can't read a word spelled right in front of his face... and adorable? I thought you were homophobic. I think this one may surpass the original in sheer and complete retarded-ness.
"and he does not understand irony!!!! which wouldnt matter, because he is a jew nazi faggot like myself!!"
More historical and now, sociological, contradictins inherent in his statements. And as for irony, I know and understand exactly what you are doing. I'm just making you look even stupider than you already are by using reason, rather than your brand of mindlessness.
"you might as well be in a wheelchair you are so stupid."
So now you're picking on the disabled as well! Wow. I'm impressed at how much of an asshole you are.
"listen pillowdancer, i was conservative while you were still eating out your dad's ass. and i think thats cool. and its really cool how you have no imagimination, and must take everything literally."
Okay, how can you talk about having no imagination when you say little words of wisdom like "eat out your dad's ass", huh? That's not very imaginative. And, an unimaginative person would, rather than compose a nice statement to hammer your excessive stupidity, simply join in and act just like you. Like an utter buffoon. And sorry to say, but it's reports like these that look good on job interviews and such. If you had a sarcastic, stupid message like the one i'm dismembering now in your portfolio you would never have a job. Just telling you that, since you are probably too stupid to have figured it out yourself.
"regarding my insults. i am a doctor of vitamintology. i am so smart that i do not have to make sense, because, there are many ignorant people out there that will follow my every word without any question."
No, you are an idiotic flamer who tries to act like Michael Savage and ends up sounding more like a slightly more intelligent version of Bill Clinton.
"you arent a racist? well, i am, you stupid nigger!!!!"
I thought EZboard's censors would catch the n-word. And I'm not black. Oh, and while we're on the topic... go call a black person a "n*****" and see what happens to you. You'll either be beaten shitless or face a lawsuit. Or better yet- I could just tell my 31337 friend Chaotic about your little anti-black tirade, and he'll just dismember your computer rather than your arguments.
" im mikey savage, i think all black people are evil wizards!!"
Well you're obviously not Michael Savage. And see above, racist scum.
"or something equally idiotic!!! i may be a stupid, self loathing jew, with alot of hate, but more than that, i am a brilliant buisinessman.SmOoCh!!! "
So let's get this straight, you compare yourself with the nazis and commies? You need psychological help. Badly. Lol.
"i simply figured out how i could make money off of a bunch of flag @#%$ neanderthals like yourself, and it has made me a millionair!!!! double smooch. listen, i do not care about gramattimacl mistaykes!!!"
More racism, anti-Americanism, stupidity, and deliberate at that. Retardation breeds.
" i am mikey savage, and grammer is for borderjumping nazi commie jews like yourself, and you are so into me."
Again, thank God you're not Michael Savage. Of course, if you were, you wouldn't be famous, because you're being a bitch.
"if i said, "listen, meatxaplishin, seriously, why dont you and me just 69 eachother, i mean, just between two heterosexual men, and, you think im the coolest and all, so, whaddaya sa-"
my sentance would be cut off by your tounge gliding smoothly through my anus. nighty night. you sir, are the definition of a commie jew nazi!!!@!$#%@!$@$##5 "
Okay, this just epitomizes being disgusting, and this is far lower than any humor. You suck at debate. There's no question about that now.
"snuggifully yours, "
Ew, I hope not.
Left-Wing Hypocrisy...
Just a thought here. Within the left-wing, two of the dominant issues are environmentalism and homosexuality. There are a large amount of left-wing individuals who are supportive of both. However, there is a very large, but very subtle hypocrisy in any stance supporting both gays and the environment, and that's the subject of this little message. How can a left-winger support a perfect, natural environment that's free from the corruption of humanity's pollutions, yet on the other hand support the unnatural and perverse actions of homosexuals? It just doesn't work that way.
Now, I believe in the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, and I am a Christian. So my point of view is that all creation is under God and He made it a specific way, and he placed us humans here to care for it. This automatically supports environmentalism, that we simply have to stop polluting the air and seas at the rate we are now. This also automatically disqualifies homosexuality, because it is not natural nor intended. Were it a natural expression of sexuality, a man would be able to make a baby with another man, and vice versa with women. Not only do the genitalia fail to match up in homosexual relationships, but God commands it as wrong anyway.
Now let's examine the psychological implications on households run by homosexual couples. Should the couple choose to adopt a child, that child will likely have mental problems throughout their life. Children require a fit mother and a fit father to rear them properly. Without the father, there are several things that quickly go wrong.
" Boys raised outside of intact marriages are, on average, more than twice as likely as other boys to end up jailed, even after controlling for other demographic factors. Each year spent without a dad in the home increases the odds of future incarceration by about five percent. " -Wall Street Journal, December 1st, 1998.
"Fatherless children are at dramatically greater risk of suicide." -U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Center for Health Statistics, Survey on Child Health, Washington, D.C., 1993.
Also see these links.
http://www.fathermag.com/news/2776-UCSB.shtml
http://www.fathermag.com/news/2798-teenage-parents.shtml
http://www.hon.ch/News/HSN/511438.html
Thus, do we eliminate homosexual households as good places for children. On the same coin, we can also say that children out of wedlock are also bad places to raise a child. Let's just get this over with- the first and foremost purpose of sex is to produce children. The first and foremost purpose of a family unit is to produce children to continue the good ol' gene pool and contribute to society. The obvious truth is that homosexual sex does not create children, homosexual relationships with children involved are never good for the child, and that children need a mother and father. In these statements we have completely disqualified homosexual marriage as a sane cause, and defined homosexuality as unnatural.
So why, then, would any liberal who supports earth remaining natural even consider supporting homosexuality in any form? There's no getting around the fact that the earth is already in serious trouble with the poisons and bacteria in the ocean, air, soil, and very food we eat. We don't need to add more AIDS to this planet. Another proven fact is that AIDS and other STDs cccur much more frequently in homosexuals than in heterosexuals. So not only does it fly in the face of natural order, but it is damaging to the biosphere, just like CFC's.
If the left wing ideals are so far and away ridiculous that they support two contradictory causes, then this country may very well be on a one-way track to destruction unless either the left reforms and rethinks its ideas, or the right gains more control and re-thinks it's environmental policies.
Now, I believe in the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, and I am a Christian. So my point of view is that all creation is under God and He made it a specific way, and he placed us humans here to care for it. This automatically supports environmentalism, that we simply have to stop polluting the air and seas at the rate we are now. This also automatically disqualifies homosexuality, because it is not natural nor intended. Were it a natural expression of sexuality, a man would be able to make a baby with another man, and vice versa with women. Not only do the genitalia fail to match up in homosexual relationships, but God commands it as wrong anyway.
Now let's examine the psychological implications on households run by homosexual couples. Should the couple choose to adopt a child, that child will likely have mental problems throughout their life. Children require a fit mother and a fit father to rear them properly. Without the father, there are several things that quickly go wrong.
" Boys raised outside of intact marriages are, on average, more than twice as likely as other boys to end up jailed, even after controlling for other demographic factors. Each year spent without a dad in the home increases the odds of future incarceration by about five percent. " -Wall Street Journal, December 1st, 1998.
"Fatherless children are at dramatically greater risk of suicide." -U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Center for Health Statistics, Survey on Child Health, Washington, D.C., 1993.
Also see these links.
http://www.fathermag.com/news/2776-UCSB.shtml
http://www.fathermag.com/news/2798-teenage-parents.shtml
http://www.hon.ch/News/HSN/511438.html
Thus, do we eliminate homosexual households as good places for children. On the same coin, we can also say that children out of wedlock are also bad places to raise a child. Let's just get this over with- the first and foremost purpose of sex is to produce children. The first and foremost purpose of a family unit is to produce children to continue the good ol' gene pool and contribute to society. The obvious truth is that homosexual sex does not create children, homosexual relationships with children involved are never good for the child, and that children need a mother and father. In these statements we have completely disqualified homosexual marriage as a sane cause, and defined homosexuality as unnatural.
So why, then, would any liberal who supports earth remaining natural even consider supporting homosexuality in any form? There's no getting around the fact that the earth is already in serious trouble with the poisons and bacteria in the ocean, air, soil, and very food we eat. We don't need to add more AIDS to this planet. Another proven fact is that AIDS and other STDs cccur much more frequently in homosexuals than in heterosexuals. So not only does it fly in the face of natural order, but it is damaging to the biosphere, just like CFC's.
If the left wing ideals are so far and away ridiculous that they support two contradictory causes, then this country may very well be on a one-way track to destruction unless either the left reforms and rethinks its ideas, or the right gains more control and re-thinks it's environmental policies.
